NEW VIDEO: Graham Hancock's "Dangerous Ideas"

Why did the popular Netflix documentary ignite the ire of The Guardian?

Graham Hancock's controversial Netflix series, "Ancient Apocalypse," has sparked intense debate within the archaeological community and beyond.

In this eight-part documentary, Hancock challenges the mainstream view by arguing that human civilization is far older than traditional archaeology suggests.

He posits that a catastrophic event, occurring around 12,000 years ago, erased much of this ancient history. Through a compelling presentation of physical evidence, geological anomalies, and ancient megalithic structures, Hancock invites viewers to reconsider accepted historical timelines.

Additionally, he draws intriguing parallels between global mythic stories, all hinting at a massive, world-changing catastrophe. These myths, ranging from floods to strange visitors, suggest a shared, forgotten past.

By questioning the mainstream narrative and examining new evidence, Hancock encourages a re-evaluation of our ancient history, challenging us to remain open to alternative perspectives and the possibility that we are a species with amnesia. This thought-provoking series raises important questions about our past and the ways we interpret historical evidence.

So why does the Guardian liken it to white supremacy? And paint Hancock as a zealot, dabbling on the fringes of what is ‘acceptable’?

Odd, huh?

Especially when you look into why it is they find it all so garment-rendingly, irredeemably awful.

Enjoy!

I am a fantasy author, illustrator and aspiring poet. If you’d like to help support my projects, you can find my fantasy work here.

My first book ‘The Farmer and the Fald’ is available here.

Also, a big thank you to my faithful three supporters across Patreon and PayPal.